[今日] 打造紅襪王朝? 洛爾:我們就像三連霸 … - 美國職棒

By Jessica
at 2009-02-25T17:07
at 2009-02-25T17:07
Table of Contents
※ [本文轉錄自 BaseballNEWS 看板]
作者: Seki (勞燕分飛) 看板: BaseballNEWS
標題: [今日] 打造紅襪王朝? 洛爾:我們就像三連霸時的洋基
時間: Wed Feb 25 16:32:53 2009
MLB/打造紅襪王朝? 洛爾:我們就像三連霸時的洋基
記者陳思豪/綜合報導 (2009/02/25 15:20)
今年波士頓紅襪的春訓基地,比起往年有很大的不同,因為他們少了能帶給大家歡
笑與喜悅的拉米瑞茲(Manny Ramirez),同時也少了遲到、早退,要求交易與抱怨
合約的話題,也沒有隨時充斥耳邊的音樂聲。大家今年用平靜的心投入訓練,期待
能複製04年與07年的表現,再度擁抱世界大賽冠軍。
沒有了拉米瑞茲,紅襪必須改變八年來的習慣。他們將揚棄以往靠「左右門神打天
下」的風格。取而代之的則是全面開花的攻擊火網。三壘手洛爾(Mike Lowell)表
示,「我們的攻擊更平均,大家都有一棒痛擊對手的實力。」
1998年,洛爾曾經效力過紐約洋基,雖然該年他只有8場的出賽,不過洛爾表示目前
的紅襪,跟當時三連霸的洋基(1998年~2000年)非常相似。兩隊都沒有隻手遮天的
全壘打製造機,不過卻都有平均的攻擊火力與厚實的投手陣容。
回顧洋基三連霸時期,當時並沒有一位球員,能在單季交出超過30支全壘打的表現,
不過大家一點都沒有懷疑當時邪惡帝國的打擊實力。威廉斯(Bernie Williams)、
馬丁尼茲(Tino Martinez)、布洛薛斯(Scott Brosius)、歐尼爾(Paul O`Neill)
組成的打線,依舊讓他們在那幾年無往不利。
新球季的紅襪,將承襲洋基三連霸時期的風格,他們有傷癒的歐提茲(David Ortiz)、
年年上看30轟的貝伊(Jason Bay)、勇奪漢克阿倫獎的尤基里斯,以及朱魯(J.D
Drew)、洛爾,這樣的打線,也難怪佩卓亞在訓練結束後要興奮的說,「看了這樣
的陣容,我想我已經開始不在想念曼尼了。」
今日新聞
http://www.nownews.com/2009/02/25/341-2413741.htm
===
BostonHerald 原文
http://0rz.tw/KOeZZ
Without Manny Ramirez, Red Sox pumped
不過標題那句我找不到XD
Lowell was asked this week if the Sox would be hard-pressed to score as many
runs without Ramirez, and he responded so quickly you would have thought we
were giving points for speed.
“Absolutely not,” said Lowell. “My first big league camp was with the
Yankees and I looked around and I didn’t really see any perennial home run
hitters. That was 1998. Looking back now, those teams that won World Series
in ’98, ’99 and 2000, I wonder who was the home run hitter on those teams.
People can’t answer that question because you had a Bernie Williams, a Tino
Martinez, a (Scott) Brosius, a Paul O’Neill, guys like that. And it seemed
like you didn’t have to fear any one guy, but there were seven or eight guys
who could give you a good at-bat. And sometimes that’s almost better.”
--
作者: Seki (勞燕分飛) 看板: BaseballNEWS
標題: [今日] 打造紅襪王朝? 洛爾:我們就像三連霸時的洋基
時間: Wed Feb 25 16:32:53 2009
MLB/打造紅襪王朝? 洛爾:我們就像三連霸時的洋基
記者陳思豪/綜合報導 (2009/02/25 15:20)
今年波士頓紅襪的春訓基地,比起往年有很大的不同,因為他們少了能帶給大家歡
笑與喜悅的拉米瑞茲(Manny Ramirez),同時也少了遲到、早退,要求交易與抱怨
合約的話題,也沒有隨時充斥耳邊的音樂聲。大家今年用平靜的心投入訓練,期待
能複製04年與07年的表現,再度擁抱世界大賽冠軍。
沒有了拉米瑞茲,紅襪必須改變八年來的習慣。他們將揚棄以往靠「左右門神打天
下」的風格。取而代之的則是全面開花的攻擊火網。三壘手洛爾(Mike Lowell)表
示,「我們的攻擊更平均,大家都有一棒痛擊對手的實力。」
1998年,洛爾曾經效力過紐約洋基,雖然該年他只有8場的出賽,不過洛爾表示目前
的紅襪,跟當時三連霸的洋基(1998年~2000年)非常相似。兩隊都沒有隻手遮天的
全壘打製造機,不過卻都有平均的攻擊火力與厚實的投手陣容。
回顧洋基三連霸時期,當時並沒有一位球員,能在單季交出超過30支全壘打的表現,
不過大家一點都沒有懷疑當時邪惡帝國的打擊實力。威廉斯(Bernie Williams)、
馬丁尼茲(Tino Martinez)、布洛薛斯(Scott Brosius)、歐尼爾(Paul O`Neill)
組成的打線,依舊讓他們在那幾年無往不利。
新球季的紅襪,將承襲洋基三連霸時期的風格,他們有傷癒的歐提茲(David Ortiz)、
年年上看30轟的貝伊(Jason Bay)、勇奪漢克阿倫獎的尤基里斯,以及朱魯(J.D
Drew)、洛爾,這樣的打線,也難怪佩卓亞在訓練結束後要興奮的說,「看了這樣
的陣容,我想我已經開始不在想念曼尼了。」
今日新聞
http://www.nownews.com/2009/02/25/341-2413741.htm
===
BostonHerald 原文
http://0rz.tw/KOeZZ
Without Manny Ramirez, Red Sox pumped
不過標題那句我找不到XD
Lowell was asked this week if the Sox would be hard-pressed to score as many
runs without Ramirez, and he responded so quickly you would have thought we
were giving points for speed.
“Absolutely not,” said Lowell. “My first big league camp was with the
Yankees and I looked around and I didn’t really see any perennial home run
hitters. That was 1998. Looking back now, those teams that won World Series
in ’98, ’99 and 2000, I wonder who was the home run hitter on those teams.
People can’t answer that question because you had a Bernie Williams, a Tino
Martinez, a (Scott) Brosius, a Paul O’Neill, guys like that. And it seemed
like you didn’t have to fear any one guy, but there were seven or eight guys
who could give you a good at-bat. And sometimes that’s almost better.”
--
Tags:
美國職棒
All Comments

By Ula
at 2009-02-26T02:55
at 2009-02-26T02:55

By Emily
at 2009-03-01T18:28
at 2009-03-01T18:28

By Freda
at 2009-03-04T20:09
at 2009-03-04T20:09
Related Posts
WBC正選名單

By Oscar
at 2009-02-25T09:50
at 2009-02-25T09:50
Baseball America: Top 100 Prospects

By Anthony
at 2009-02-25T02:11
at 2009-02-25T02:11
Tomorrow's lineups and pitchers

By Mia
at 2009-02-25T01:00
at 2009-02-25T01:00
[TSNA] Penny練投狀況好 重返賽場指日可待

By Hedda
at 2009-02-24T18:46
at 2009-02-24T18:46
2009/2/23

By Enid
at 2009-02-24T18:46
at 2009-02-24T18:46